Escalation of U.S. Immigration Policies and Military Actions Under Trump Administration
Nov, 25 2025
Phil Gunson, a senior analyst for the Andes region with the International Crisis Group, stated that the Cártel de los Soles is not a drug trafficking organization but rather a label applied to military corruption. He emphasized that the military's involvement in drug trafficking is primarily motivated by financial gain rather than ideological objectives. Alexander Aviña, an associate professor of Latin American history at Arizona State University, highlighted that U.S. military interventions in Latin America have historically resulted in significant human suffering. He expressed concern that the current U.S. actions in Venezuela are part of a broader strategy to exert influence over the region, potentially leading to further military actions against other countries.
The situation in Venezuela is compounded by a humanitarian crisis that has persisted for over a decade, with limited international airline access contributing to the country's isolation. Gunson noted that while some Venezuelans may support U.S. intervention to remove Maduro, many others fear the consequences of such actions, which could exacerbate the existing humanitarian emergency. Aviña warned that any military action against Venezuela would likely violate the country's sovereignty and lead to increased human suffering, including potential displacement of people. He pointed out that the U.S. government's framing of the situation as a war on drugs, terror, and migration is indicative of a larger imperialist agenda in Latin America, with Venezuela serving as a focal point for these efforts.
In parallel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is expanding its plans to outsource immigrant tracking to private surveillance firms, abandoning a previous $180 million pilot proposal in favor of a program without spending limits. Reports indicate that ICE intends to employ bounty hunters and private investigators for verification tasks, which include confirming the home and work addresses of individuals targeted for removal. This shift indicates that ICE is transitioning from a trial phase to a more permanent investment in private surveillance capabilities.
The proposed scope of the program is extensive, with contractors expected to handle monthly batches of 50,000 cases from a total of 1.5 million individuals. The contract structure includes performance-based incentives, where firms are compensated per case and can earn bonuses for efficiency and accuracy. This initiative reflects a broader trend under the Trump administration to expand the role of contractors within ICE's enforcement operations, raising concerns about the implications of privatizing immigration enforcement.
Additionally, recent reports indicate that child trafficking arrests in the United States have reached their lowest levels in five years, coinciding with a shift in focus by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) towards immigration enforcement. According to The New York Times, the number of indictments for child exploitation crimes has dropped by 28 percent compared to the previous year, with agents historically involved in these investigations now reportedly working on such cases during their personal time. An internal report from Homeland Security Investigations revealed that approximately 300 fewer child victims were identified or rescued in the past year, marking a 17 percent decline.
This data reflects a broader trend under the Trump administration's immigration policies, which have prioritized political objectives over pressing public safety issues. Despite claims from Attorney General Pam Bondi that immigration sweeps would target violent criminals and child molesters, statistics show that 40 percent of immigrants detained by ICE have no criminal record. The focus on immigration enforcement has reportedly led to dissatisfaction among ICE agents, who are now primarily tasked with detaining noncriminal immigrants to meet a quota of 3,000 arrests per day, as mandated by Homeland Security adviser Stephen Miller.
These developments highlight the implications of prioritizing immigration enforcement and political agendas over critical social issues, such as child exploitation and homelessness, raising concerns about the effectiveness of current policies in addressing the needs of vulnerable populations.