Funeral of Dick Cheney Highlights Political Divisions and Legacy
Nov, 20 2025
Cheney, who served under President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2009, was a prominent figure in shaping U.S. foreign policy during the post-9/11 era, particularly through his support for military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan. His legacy remains contentious, with critics highlighting the humanitarian costs and long-term implications of such policies.
The guest list reflected a time when bipartisan respect was more common, featuring notable figures from both major parties, including Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, Al Gore, and Nancy Pelosi. However, the absence of former President Donald Trump and current Vice President JD Vance was significant, illustrating the rift between traditional Republican values and the populist agenda that Trump represents. Cheney's family, particularly his daughter Liz Cheney, has been vocal in their criticism of Trump, especially following the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection.
During the service, George W. Bush delivered a eulogy, describing Cheney as a "calm and steady presence" and one of the finest public servants of his generation. The ceremony included remarks from Cheney's family, emphasizing his dual role as a public servant and a family man. Honorary pallbearers included members of Cheney's Secret Service detail and former aides.
The political dynamics surrounding Cheney's funeral reflect broader shifts within the Republican Party, as Liz Cheney has distanced herself from the party and endorsed Vice President Harris for the 2024 presidential election, raising concerns about the implications of a potential second term for Trump. This evolving landscape underscores the ongoing ideological battles within the party, particularly regarding the legacy of militarism and the direction of U.S. foreign policy.
While the funeral was not classified as a state funeral, it nonetheless highlighted the complex legacy of Dick Cheney, whose influence on American governance and foreign policy continues to provoke debate and reflection on the costs of military interventions and the principles of democracy.