Former U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a 'Board of Peace' aimed at overseeing the reconstruction of Gaza and addressing global conflicts. This initiative includes invitations to approximately 60 countries, with notable figures such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio among its proposed members. The Kremlin has confirmed that it is reviewing the invitation, with spokesperson Dmitry Peskov indicating that further discussions with the United States are anticipated.

The board, which Trump would chair for life, requires member countries to pay a permanent membership fee of $1 billion, a stipulation that has raised concerns regarding its financial viability and implications for equitable participation. Critics have described the initiative as a potential alternative to the United Nations, with some diplomats warning that it could undermine the UN's established role in international conflict resolution. The United Nations Security Council has already approved a mandate for addressing the Gaza conflict until 2027, which raises questions about the legitimacy of Trump's proposal.

The initiative has garnered mixed responses, with Hungary being one of the few countries to openly accept the invitation. Italian Prime Minister Giorgio Meloni and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney have expressed conditional interest, although the specifics of their participation remain unclear. The board is expected to initially focus on the Gaza conflict before potentially expanding to other global issues, including the situation in Ukraine.

Concerns have also been raised about the involvement of Tony Blair, given his controversial history related to the 2003 invasion of Iraq and his previous role in peace efforts that faced criticism for perceived biases. Additionally, the inclusion of Putin has led to speculation regarding Trump's stance towards Russia amidst ongoing tensions related to the Ukraine conflict.

The proposed board's charter suggests a departure from traditional peacebuilding frameworks, emphasizing a need for a more agile approach to international governance. However, this has prompted warnings from UN officials about the risks of undermining established international norms and the potential regression in global cooperation. The initiative's financial structure and its implications for global governance continue to be points of contention among international observers.