Trump's Claims of Leadership in Venezuela
Jan, 13 2026
In the wake of Maduro's removal, Trump indicated that the U.S. would oversee the country until a "safe, proper and judicious transition" could be established, implying a potential long-term U.S. presence. However, Secretary of State Marco Rubio clarified that the U.S. does not plan to engage in direct governance but will instead exert economic pressure through sanctions and an oil "quarantine" to influence Venezuela's political landscape.
The U.S. currently has no permanent military or diplomatic presence in Venezuela. Protests erupted in Caracas, with thousands of Maduro supporters denouncing U.S. actions as violations of national sovereignty and labeling them as "colonial aggression." Protesters displayed signs demanding the release of Maduro and criticized U.S. involvement.
Rodríguez has publicly rejected the notion that the U.S. is controlling Venezuela, asserting that her government is sovereign. Nevertheless, reports indicate that she is negotiating with the Trump administration to avert further military actions, following Trump's threats of significant consequences if U.S. demands are not met. Social media commentary has highlighted skepticism regarding the U.S. administration's capability to manage foreign affairs, with some users questioning Trump's ability to govern effectively.
Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) criticized Trump's self-declaration as "acting president" while neglecting domestic issues affecting American families. Critics have described the U.S. approach to Venezuela as an extortion scheme, suggesting that the administration's demands for oil in exchange for political support reflect a troubling dynamic in international relations.