Iran's Reaction to U.S. Military Threats Amid Protests
Jan, 13 2026
The protests, which began on December 28, have posed a serious challenge to the Islamic Republic's nearly 50-year rule, with estimates of fatalities ranging from 12,000 to 20,000 according to various sources. Eyewitness accounts and medical reports have highlighted the violent crackdown by Iranian authorities, with the Supreme National Security Council reportedly issuing orders for live fire against protesters. This unprecedented level of violence has raised alarms about human rights violations and the humanitarian implications of the government's response.
In the U.S., President Donald Trump received a briefing on potential responses to the protests, including military strikes, cyber operations, and psychological measures aimed at supporting the protesters. While military options remain on the table, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized that diplomacy is the preferred approach. Trump has expressed readiness to intervene if violence against protesters continues, framing the situation as one that requires respect for human rights.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has indicated that while Iran is not seeking war, it is prepared for conflict and open to negotiations under conditions of mutual respect. Meanwhile, the U.S. Virtual Embassy in Iran has issued a security alert advising American citizens to leave the country due to escalating unrest.
Internationally, responses have varied, with figures such as Finland's Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen condemning the violent crackdown and internet shutdown in Iran. Exiled figures, including former Queen Farah Pahlavi, have expressed solidarity with the protesters, urging the armed forces to refrain from supporting the regime's violent actions.
As the situation evolves, the implications of military engagement and the humanitarian crisis in Iran remain critical points of concern for both Iranian citizens and the international community.