On June 18, 2023, a group of 25 House Republicans sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin, requesting an investigation into the alleged presence of Mifepristone, a medication used in abortion, in wastewater systems. The lawmakers claimed that residual amounts of the drug could interfere with fertility, despite the lack of scientific evidence supporting this assertion. They sought clarification on the EPA's capabilities to detect these substances in water supplies and what resources would be necessary to develop such methods.

This request has raised significant concerns regarding the potential use of government funds to investigate unfounded claims about medication abortion contaminating drinking water. Former EPA officials indicated that the agency has developed technology that could be used for surveillance in states where abortion is illegal, potentially isolating sources of medication use to specific locations, although such measures would be legally complex and costly.

The anti-abortion movement has a history of disseminating disinformation, including the myth that abortion medications contaminate water supplies. This narrative has gained traction in political discourse, influencing federal policy and raising alarms about increased surveillance of individuals seeking reproductive healthcare. The spread of such disinformation has been linked to a broader trend of criminalizing pregnant individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities.

The rise in prosecutions related to pregnancy, particularly following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, has been documented, with over 400 individuals prosecuted for pregnancy-related crimes in the two years following the ruling. This increase is often attributed to the expansion of 'fetal personhood' laws, which grant legal rights to embryos and fetuses, frequently at the expense of the rights of pregnant individuals.

The implications of these developments are profound, as they reflect a growing trend of state surveillance and control over reproductive choices, particularly affecting low-income women and women of color. The framing of these issues under the guise of protecting life often obscures the reality of how such policies disproportionately impact vulnerable populations. As the government continues to expand its surveillance capabilities, the right to privacy and bodily autonomy remains at risk.

In a separate but related issue, a collaborative investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Arlington, Texas Police Department resulted in the arrest of 21 individuals associated with the Kiccdoe gang on November 6, 2025. The charges against these suspects include racketeering, murder, assault in aid of racketeering, drug trafficking, and various firearm offenses.

FBI Director Kash Patel noted that the operation, which targeted the Kiccdoe gang operating in the Dallas/Fort Worth area, involved the participation of 450 local and federal law enforcement personnel. The investigation began in April 2024 following a homicide on the campus of an Arlington high school, which allegedly triggered retaliatory violence between Kiccdoe and other gangs in the region.

Court documents indicate that Kiccdoe members engaged in a range of violent activities, including murder, drive-by shootings, robberies, and drug trafficking, particularly involving fentanyl and marijuana. These actions reportedly instilled fear within various Arlington communities over a three-year period, from early 2022 to 2025.

The Kiccdoe gang is said to have originated from the 600 block of East Arkansas Lane in Arlington. Members allegedly identified themselves through specific terminology and symbols associated with the gang, including the use of social media to promote their activities and maintain their violent reputation. A federal criminal complaint filed on November 4 outlines the gang's structure and the violent crimes committed in furtherance of their racketeering activities, which include one murder, six attempted murders, and numerous robberies and assaults.

The gang's operations were reportedly funded through the sale of narcotics, with violence employed as a means to secure and expand their influence and control over local territories. The individuals charged in this case include a range of young adults from the Arlington area, all of whom have made initial appearances before a federal magistrate judge following their arrests.